The 20 best-rated places for a second home in Portugal
The same five pillars, re-weighted towards what a second-home buyer actually optimises for: climate, surroundings and services over investment return.
- Drawn
- Jul 31, 2026
- Ranked from
- 302 municipalities
- Excluded, provisional
- 0
- Scoring model
- 2026.12-momentum-v1
| # | Municipality | Province | Population | Lifestyle score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Esposende | Braga | 37,866 | 73/100 | A |
| 2 | Póvoa de Varzim | Porto | 70,149 | 72/100 | A |
| 3 | Vila do Conde | Porto | 84,710 | 70/100 | A |
| 3 | Mafra | Lisboa | 93,994 | 70/100 | A |
| 3 | Ponta delgada | Açores | 70,946 | 70/100 | A |
| 3 | Matosinhos | Porto | 180,417 | 70/100 | A |
| 7 | Porto | Porto | 267,236 | 69/100 | A |
| 7 | Óbidos | Leiria | 13,456 | 69/100 | A |
| 7 | Vila Nova de Cerveira | Viana do Castelo | 9,960 | 69/100 | A |
| 10 | Torres Vedras | Lisboa | 91,589 | 68/100 | A |
| 10 | Viana do Castelo | Viana do Castelo | 91,336 | 68/100 | A |
| 10 | Espinho | Aveiro | 32,210 | 68/100 | A |
| 10 | Caminha | Viana do Castelo | 16,967 | 68/100 | A |
| 14 | Vila Nova de Famalicão | Braga | 140,750 | 67/100 | B |
| 14 | Ílhavo | Aveiro | 42,249 | 67/100 | B |
| 14 | Marinha Grande | Leiria | 44,616 | 67/100 | B |
| 14 | Braga | Braga | 209,088 | 67/100 | B |
| 14 | Lourinhã | Lisboa | 29,007 | 67/100 | B |
| 14 | Valença | Viana do Castelo | 15,351 | 67/100 | B |
| 14 | Mira | Coimbra | 12,576 | 67/100 | B |
What this table leaves out, and why
- 0 municipalities were dropped for a provisional grade. Where one of the five pillars has no data for a town, the site fills it with a neutral value and marks the grade provisional. That is fair on the town's own page, where the marker is visible. In a ranking it is not: a town competing on two measured pillars and three neutral ones would place on the strength of what we do not know about it.
- 6 were below the population floor of 2,000 inhabitants. Percentile scores are unstable where a single amenity or a single housing development moves the whole figure, and those places sort to the top of an ungated list.
- Tied towns share a rank. Scores are published as whole numbers and they saturate at the top of a table, so several towns here hold the same score and therefore the same position. Where a tie has to be broken to fit twenty rows, it is broken alphabetically — which is arbitrary, and is why the rank is shared rather than invented.
- The ranking is within Portugal, not across Europe. Each pillar is a percentile against that country's own distribution, so a Spanish 80 and an Italian 80 are two statements about two different populations. Pooling them would rank countries, not towns.
- This is a municipality, not a house. Everything here describes the place — its climate, its hazards, its services, its market. It says nothing about any individual property in it.
Computed under scoring model 2026.12-momentum-v1. A ranking published under a different model version is not directly comparable with this one — the weights or the inputs changed, so a town moving between two editions may be the model moving rather than the town.
Using it
Free to reproduce, in whole or in part, with attribution to Terragrado and a link to this page or to the methodology. The CSV carries the same rows plus the edition, the model version and a link to each town's page, so a reader can check any line of it.
Showing one of these towns on your own site? There is an embeddable grade badge for that.